<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog &#124; BenHollis.net &#187; Scoble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benhollis.net/blog/tags/scoble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benhollis.net/blog</link>
	<description>News about BenHollis.net and articles about Ben&#039;s interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where does Apple fit into the blog philosophy?</title>
		<link>http://benhollis.net/blog/2006/02/28/where-does-apple-fit-in-the-blog-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://benhollis.net/blog/2006/02/28/where-does-apple-fit-in-the-blog-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hollis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoble]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brh.numbera.com/blog/index.php/2006/02/28/where-does-apple-fit-in-the-blog-philosophy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just heard an interview with Robert Scoble on KUOW (Seattle&#8217;s NPR station). I&#8217;ve been reading Scoble&#8217;s blog for a long time, and I have agreed with most of the things he&#8217;s said over the years about the importance of blogging for companies in a world where word-of-mouth can spread a story around the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard an interview with <a title="The Scobleizer" href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/">Robert Scoble</a> on <a title="94.9 KUOW: Seattle's NPR News and Information Station" href="http://www.kuow.org/">KUOW</a> (Seattle&#8217;s NPR station). I&#8217;ve been reading Scoble&#8217;s blog for a long time, and I have agreed with most of the things he&#8217;s said over the years about the importance of blogging for companies in a world where word-of-mouth can spread a story around the world in minutes. Specifically, I agree that transparency and the &#8220;naked conversations&#8221; (as the title of <a title="Naked Conversations : How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/047174719X/brhnumberacom-20">Scoble&#8217;s book</a> puts it) are beneficial to both the customers of a company like Microsoft but also to the company itself &#8211; they recieve feedback and can keep bad spin from igniting the blogosphere (ugh, I can&#8217;t believe I just used that word) like a brush fire.</p>
<p>However, I have a big question for Scoble and the other corporate blogging proponents. What about Apple? Apple doesn&#8217;t blog at all as far as I know &#8211; even <a title="Dave Hyatt's defunct Safari blog" href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/">Dave Hyatt&#8217;s old Safari blog</a> is long gone. Yet people hang on their every word, every product announcement. Even the completely uninteresting <a title="Engadget: All of today's Apple Coverage" href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/28/all-of-todays-apple-coverage/">launch of the new Intel Mac mini and iPod Hi-Fi</a> was talked about all over the place &#8211; I got sick of tabbing through people repeating the story in my RSS reader. <a title="Engadget" href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a> and some other tech blogs had a posts for weeks before the keynote buzzing about the magical products that might be released. You couldn&#8217;t hope for better PR. And even after the disappointing keynote, people still had positive things to say, despite some worrying problems with the new Mac mini (I admit, I was stoked to buy an Intel Mac mini when they came out, but I think I&#8217;ll reconsider for the time being).</p>
<p>When I interviewed at Apple I asked them why they didn&#8217;t blog, why there wasn&#8217;t more transparency. They responded that secrecy and surprise are one of Apple&#8217;s biggest assets, which I completely understand. But I don&#8217;t see Apple employees blogging about <a title="Carbon" href="http://developer.apple.com/carbon/">Carbon</a>, or <a title="Automator" href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/automator/">Automator</a>, or any of the cool things that people aready know about, the same way I see Microsoft employees blogging about <a title="Too many .NET blogs to count" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/">.NET</a> or <a title="Microsoft Gadgets" href="http://microsoftgadgets.com/">Microsoft Gadgets</a>. What I&#8217;d love to have explained to me is how a company can survive, or rather, be loved so thouroughly, completely, and perhaps irrationally, without the level of transparency Scoble prescribes. Is it that blogging doesn&#8217;t really help the way we hope it does, or that it only helps for new companies and companies that already start out <a rev="vote-against" title="Who else?" href="http://slashdot.org/search.pl?tid=109">reviled by much of the community</a> such as Microsoft?</p>
<p><strong>Update (3/29/06):</strong> Scoble and Shel Israel came and gave an enjoyable talk today, and I got to ask them a version of the question I had posted above. I wish I could have talked with them further, but they basically said that while Apple is a PR powerhouse now, their lack of transparency will bite them in the long run. I tend to agree with that, but I think right now blogging is significantly more necessary for companies that don&#8217;t have flawless PR or fanatical customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benhollis.net/blog/2006/02/28/where-does-apple-fit-in-the-blog-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
